Intel claims its Core Ultra 200S Plus CPUs smash AMD Ryzen 5 and 7 in creator workloads

Though not especially remarkable in gaming, the additional E cores should help the Core Ulta 200S Plus to excel in multi-core performance workloads.

Intel has seemingly updated its Core Ultra 200S Plus desktop CPU performance slides to target creators rather than gamers. Arrow Lake-S Refresh should still offer good value for gamers, I would imagine, but core-heavy tasks will see the biggest uplifts.

According to these new slides, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is up to 85% faster than AMD’s Ryzen 5 9600X in creator workloads such as Blender. For reference, these chips were tied in gaming, delivering an identical 37-game geomean. Intel also claims the same 85% uplift in creator tasks for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compared to the Ryzen 7 9700X, which is an impressive show for a CPU that is at best 4% faster in gaming, according to official tests. Understandably, this won’t be the case on all apps, but those that can take full advantage of high-core CPUs should feel the difference.

Intel Core Ultra 200S Plus vs AMD Ryzen 9000.
Source: Videocardz.

With hours ahead of launch, Team Blue seems to have shifted focus towards the true strengths of Arrow Lake-S Refresh, i.e. multi-threading. With up to 24 cores under its cap, the Core Ultra 200S Plus should be perfect for content creation, or any high-threaded tasks for that matter, including those mixed-use loads where the efficient cores tackle background apps.

While these refreshed CPUs are unlikely to pose a threat to AMD’s X3D chips, they are also much cheaper. At $199, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus will slot against AMD’s Ryzen 5 9600X, which can currently be found at around $180, while the $299 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus will go against the Ryzen 7 9700X, available at $300. For that price, you get 18 cores split into a 6P+12E core design on the 250K Plus and 24 cores in an 8P+16E layout on the 270K Plus. Both feature an extra four E-core cluster compared to their predecessors, the 245K and 265K.

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus claimed gaming performance vs 265K

On top of that, you get a slight boost to frequency plus other architectural enhancements such as lower latency and faster memory support. According to the company’s official slides, the Core Ultra 250K Plus and 270K Plus deliver 13% and 15% higher average gaming performance than their predecessors, respectively. This reaches up to 39% in favourable games like Shadow of the Tomb Raider. In other words, they should offer a measurable uplift for those upgrading from an older Arrow Lake chip.

The Core Ultra 200S Plus lineup is set to hit retail on March 26, 2026, but reviews should start popping out anytime now. This will give users enough time to find out if the upgrade is worth the cost.

Fahd Temsamani
Fahd Temsamani
Senior Writer at Club386, his love for computers began with an IBM running MS-DOS, and he’s been pushing the limits of technology ever since. Known for his overclocking prowess, Fahd once unlocked an extra 1.1GHz from a humble Pentium E5300 - a feat that cemented his reputation as a master tinkerer. Fluent in English, Arabic, and French, his motto when building a new rig is ‘il ne faut rien laisser au hasard.’

Deal of the Day

Hot Reviews

Preferred Partners

Related Reading